On 04/11/2011 13.50, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 3 November 2011 09:31, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> wrote: >> On several architectures __NR_ulimit syscall number is currently >> defined but it is remapped onto sys_ni_syscall, while on other >> architectures they are not longer defined. >> So use {get,set}rlimit only to implement ulimit interface. >> >> It fixes LTP ulimit01 test case. > > What about fixing the kernel instead to not define numbers for the > unavailable stuff? > Just curious.. >
that's another action I've planned to do but it would take more time. Without this fix we would have uClibc broken. cheers, carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
