On Tuesday 18 October 2011 16:03:13 Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > > there any documentation that lists places like this where uClibc > > doesn't meet POSIX standards? > > I doubt if this is documented.
we try with docs/uClibc_vs_SuSv3.txt, but i know we aren't good with keeping it up to date. patches welcome ;). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
