On Friday, August 12, 2011 17:01:01 Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Friday 12 August 2011 17:34:49 John Spencer wrote: > > overall this looks like a pretty useless and confusing option, which > > imho should get removed. > > even if there's a way to build a binary without those 2 object files, > > which i'm not aware of (please point it out if you know how), it doesn't > > cost nothing except of 1200 bytes harddisk storage to still build them. > > I just looked on PPC-32, uClibc-0.9.30.2. The total size of code is > 128 bytes, plus one long; which is a grand total of 132 bytes (if my > maths are not too busted, and I did not miss any symbol).
if you're just counting the .o files, you missed the usage in the libc. there's also init/fini in the ldso, but that is always enabled. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
