> Since this is hardware specific, what matrix of hardware are you intending to test? For example, if using ffmpeg, then are you testing both with and without the relevant hardware to ensure that behaviour for those without this hardware is not regressed?
My current hardware testing is on TGL, ADL, RPL, LNL, and BMG. So I do test a few generations back as well as on the hardware specifically being enabled. If you're talking about testing on a whole other vendor, I would say that this would not be a useful test because the tests were only developed with Intel's media stack in mind. The other vendor would have had to implement everything exactly the same, down to libva trace log formatting. > I think that's fine, but then it should be part of the documented test plan as to how to validate that there are no test regressions please. Sure. I just run the tests on the old package versions, upgrade only the packages being tested, and re-run the tests. Then I look at each failure to make sure that it was not passing on the old (current) version. ACK on the rest, thanks for the explanation. I'll re-run the tests again once the packages (hopefully) get submitted to proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to intel-media-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098413 Title: [SRU] Intel Battlemage cards lack hardware encode support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gmmlib/+bug/2098413/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
