(In reply to comment #11) > Therefore, distributions need to build libOSMesa separately, which is not been > done in Arch, Debian, Ubuntu currently. > > Is this the right way to compile Mesa? Is there any distributions already do > things right?
On Mageia we build Mesa twice (first the rest with shared-glapi, then OSMesa without it) for exactly this reason: http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/mesa/current/SPECS/mesa.spec?revision=424801&view=markup I wouldn't say this is the "right" way. It would be much better if Mesa was fixed so that a single build would be enough, but it seems to be non-trivial (at least to me), so this is what we ended up with. There seems to be an upstream bug report about this issue: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47824 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066599 Title: Wine is unable to detect OSMesa correctly when compiling from source To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1066599/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
