On March 30, 2018 12:17:51 PM GMT+02:00, Lord Jonathan Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >I was looking at the replace-qjackctl-a blueprint and think Candace >would >be better it is faster to use than patchage. And looks more organized >with >a ladish session. I would like an opinion on ladish vs jack, > > >Thanks, > > >jdm7dv
Hi Jonathan! Thanks for reaching out and taking the time to inveatigate the question! I kindof lost touch with music production at the same time i lost touch with ubuntu studio. I'm hoping to get chance to test Cadence. I think i remember hearing ladish development was sort of abandoned, but i might be very wrong... The rule of thumb is: if it fits in debian, it fits in UbuStu. This is because we pull packages from debian. I hope someone else can fill the many blanks. TL;DR i am not against it, but i'm not really fit for judging and i hope more ppl will get involved in giving you feedback. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
