Hi JB, I too would like to go forward with the entire backport too, but time is running short. This user has a SLA deadline of 2023-07-09. I submitted patches to the LP bug one month ago on 2023-05-26 and was subsequently blocked by the 0.12.0 upload in -unapproved on 2023-06-06. The impact for the user isn't too bad, they would like to consume the fixed adsys so they can run their testsuites internally, and they see the bug as a blocker to onboard other new users to the platform as it breaks a widely deployed use case of '-' in domain names. So low priority, apart from SLA deadlines.
Thanks, Matthew On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 19:29, Jean-Baptiste Lallement <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Matthew, > > We are still waiting for a go/no-go from the SRU team, but the discussion > seems to have stalled. I'd rather move forward with the entire backport since > it fixes much more than just this bug. > What is the priority for this customer, any deadline? > > Thanks. > > JB > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:03 AM Matthew Ruffell > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I know discussions are still ongoing about the adsys 0.12.0 SRU, but I >> have a user who wishes to have LP #2020834 [1] fixed, which high >> priority. >> >> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2020834 >> >> Would it be possible to potentially reject 0.12.0 from jammy >> -unapproved, we get LP #2020834 sponsored and uploaded, verified and >> released, before we start discussing 0.12.0 again for Jammy and Lunar? >> >> I was planning on just letting 0.12.0 happen since the fix is present >> in 0.10.0, but my user has time restrictions and would like to be able >> to use dashes '-' in their domain names. >> >> Thanks, >> Matthew -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
