Le mercredi 01 novembre 2006 à 10:56 +0000, Jib a écrit : > Sorry, if someone felt insulted. It was a mere remark to point out that it > has already done somewhere. Hence, it could teach the answer to get all work > fine. Furthermore, I wondered how Gnome project is handled inside and > outside the bounds of the projects, and generally how the project coped the > issue.
I didn't felt insulted, no worry. I just want to avoid bug comments turning to a desktop war, better to keep focused on the topic. GNOME has that feature too, it uses ogg123 though and that's not optimal. There is some patches upstream for some time to use gstreamer for that, they have not been used previously because it would make nautilus sensible to gstreamer bugs. Now gstreamer is probably good enough that it should be reconsidered maybe. > That's all I meant. You look slightly touchy. Not really, I just prefer to keep the bug on tracker before getting people starting to comment on what other desktop does. The information on how they do it could be useful though > flame war KDE/Gnome (Previously, I thought it was mostly the fans of each > desktop environment and not the developers themselves who are sensitive to > such facts… ). So : I apologize to be maladroit and let you adress this bug > the way you prefer… No need to apologize, I'm fine with other desktops doing things better, the comment was just to make clear we have no interest to discuss what other desktops do better on that bug, the focus is rather how to fix the bug To come back to the bug discussion, the way to "adress" it is to convince upstream to land the gstreamer patch, I'll talk with nautilus hackers about that during the GNOME 2.17 cycle -- Nautilus sound preview doesn't work with OGG files. https://launchpad.net/bugs/13090 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
