-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > I've updated the bug description to make it clear that there *is* > regression potential here. Indeed, the regression potential may be very > broad, and is difficult to quantify at all, precisely because such a bug > would have prevented testing in hardy (or, it appears, in gutsy) to > confirm that uswsusp works. > > As such, I'm concerned that this may not be appropriate material for an > SRU at all. > If that's the case, are you saying that pm-utils should be left in its current, broken state? While uswsusp might break for people who already have installed it, mistakenly, there are cases where people cannot hibernate without using uswsusp (and hence applying some workaround listed above which may or may not break future upgrades). Are you going to leave it like that, instead of getting the people who have already, mistakenly installed uswsusp to uninstall uswsusp?
Another thing is that if this issue is left as it is, and users for whom uswsusp is broken upgrade to Intrepid, where there's a new version of pm-utils which correctly utilizes uswsusp, then it's going to get a whole lot of bug reports and/or complaints/negative blog/forum posts saying that "Intrepid broke my hibernate!" - -- Hyperair -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIvzDG4LFcUo8CpBERAp+aAJ9N1JOkgbhmj1SS3Zdgk5x46cuFLQCggU0K xuNhuZGBBDyzrIen3jVc3eY= =Bqw8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- pm-utils doesn't detect uswsusp in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246053 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
