Hi, the license only allows redistribution, but does not allow derived works. If it would also allow modification the license looks pretty BSD-like and should be fine for main.
Please ask upstream to clarify this in the next release. Also it would be nice if they just used a `standard license' to avoid possible confusion, e.g. the MIT License [1] (but this is not necessary, it's just a good idea in my opinion). Note that this just requires to preserve the copyright notice, not the web site addresses (for that there is still Google ;-) ). Regards, Ansgar [1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php -- glest-data is not non-free https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
