On 05/08/08 at 12:24 -0000, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > "moved rdoc1.9 suggestion to depends. It is not a good idea: it causes all > the docs to be installed even if > the user only wants to run a ruby app." According to bug 228345 this is > needed for gem to work. Is that no longer the case or do you not care about > gem working?
It should never have been added to ruby1.9's depend. It should have been added to gem1.9's depends. But gem1.9 no longer exists (replaced by rubygems1.9, rubygems source package). rubygems1.9 does depend on rdoc1.9. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ** Changed in: ruby1.9 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- Please sync ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
