Stephan) Thanks, I did not realize it was that easy - for a testbed old notebook, I think I will simply add to sources.lst - lets see what's with the Audio
Sergio) fullACK even debian itself is on 2.6.25-something these days in my virtual machine... (I am thinking about making debian productive in autumn with next additional net- or subnotebook... to not only rely on ubuntu... I found openSolaris, fedora, openSuse or sabayon all not that usable than ubuntu...)... better to put the most current kernel.org kernel into "proposed" and then test that than a patch of a patch of a patch of something old... (e.g. rebuilding nvidia drivers etc. is sometimes required anyway with updates...) BUT: it felt like the versions 17 to 18 where more "performant" but on a marginal <= 50ms (?) latency on normal load) base... Still one thing: nobody tells me, except "Try this patch" - what it MEANS how to look into the matter etc. remains obscure here. Is that only reserved for the brightest experts? Why must such a message than a "hlt" one be so "unexplained"? Does anyone know where to get a better EXPLANATION of what happened? And a yes, the 2.6.24-20 from Tim Gardner does break my sound support. A shame, was the old notebook my preferred way of watching simpsons while surfing before the evening --- I'm back to .19 and wait for 2.6.25 something... which is sad, I wanted to give the old notebook away as a gift.. as much up to date as possible... still better than no pc at all for some, right? -- Hardy proposed 2.6.24-20-generic kernel update will not boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
