stephan wrote:
> That is not want I meant. Other Distros are able to build the Firefox in
> that way, that third party binary components are able to run. I think it
> is better, if the Ubuntu Firefox is build the "compatible" way. The
> Ubuntu Thunderbird for example is build the "compatible" way. That means
> that the Ubuntu maintainers of Thunderbird and Firefox have different
> build strategies. The Thunderbird strategy is better in my opinion,
> because it allows third party components.
>
> The work around, to start the Firefox from the Thunderbird makes another
> library available. That shows the different dependencies of Thunderbird
> and Firefox in the Ubuntu build.
>
> All third party components are normally build to work in the official
> Mozilla releases. Firefox and Thunderbird have no xulrunner dependency
> in that case. In Ubuntu the firefox-3.0 has a dependency on
> xulrunner-1.9. thunderbird has not.
>
> I hope this posting is a bit better understandable.
>
>
please post it to the mailing list as it is not a bug.
--
Sincerely Yours,
John Vivirito
https://launchpad.net/~gnomefreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
Linux User# 414246
--
[HARDY] binary components provided by extensions not loaded
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
