This is certainly an incompatible change in behaviour if so, though it wouldn't be the first.
Of course, if it's deciding that I'm on crack and should be ignored, surely it should never call chmod(2) in the first place? -- chmod -x fails, apparently due to umask https://launchpad.net/bugs/67583 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
