Thanks for you quick reply Szaka ! Maybe I'm going to give you a wrong answer, but I've always found that ntfs-3g is more cpu-consuming than the kernel driver (not considering only the write operations, I also find the directory listings sluggish). And I've always thought this difference occurs because of the kernel mode/userspace difference.
However, with the appearance of more and more fuse-based FS, I imagine it's not the case anymore ? You implied in your message that you can have data corruption using the kernel driver. Could you please detail ? Is this the case even in 'ro' mode ? Regards N. -- Let the user choose between ntfs-3g and ntfs kernel driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
