Oh wow! I must not have looked hard enough(.!!) as all I could find was badram. I was shocked that nothing like it was packaged or anything. Someone, through a forum system, somewhere, claimed that badram was my only option in software, and I believed it.
>And last but not least, if it's worth a couple of hundred dollars to you, if >you provide a financial incentive, >someone might as well step up and come up with something that'd serve your >needs. I never did quite get to the point of offering money for it, but I was approaching it... pivo... Thank you. And thank you again. While I still think that it would be invaluable to have the badram patch as a package, I'm stoked to learn about this other thing from you (but now i have to figure out how useful that is for me, and then use it...) Would the badram patch be a lot of extra work for someone to maintain as a package, with the rate at which kernels are released?? -- [needs-packaging] BadRAM Linux Kernel Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
