2008/5/1 Andrew Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is great that you submitted a patch to Ubuntu, but I think this bug > is much better filed upstream.
That is true, but as you say carries a risk of loss of portability. As far as I believe that changes must be made in the deb package. I do not think that the program authors applied the patch to upstream because a single operating system that font does not exist. Also, just based on reading the diff, isn't hardcoding the font path > into the source a bad idea for portability. Really it should just use > generic system fonts, but perhaps it is more complicated than that. :) Frankly, I chose this font because it was the first I saw. I do not know much about font/O.S. If you know a better font you are free to modify the patch. ** Attachment added: "unnamed" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14060924/unnamed -- Default font to embed subtitles does not exist in Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs