2008/5/1 Andrew Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> It is great that you submitted a patch to Ubuntu, but I think this bug
> is much better filed upstream.


That is true, but as you say carries a risk of loss of portability. As far
as I believe that changes must be made in the deb package.

I do not think that the program authors applied the patch to upstream
because a single operating system that font does not exist.


Also, just based on reading the diff, isn't hardcoding the font path
> into the source a bad idea for portability. Really it should just use
> generic system fonts, but perhaps it is more complicated than that. :)


Frankly, I chose this font because it was the first I saw. I do not know
much about font/O.S. If you know a better font you are free to modify the
patch.


** Attachment added: "unnamed"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14060924/unnamed

-- 
Default font to embed subtitles does not exist in Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222773
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to