These were scientific programs that were installed directly under / 
user/local, without the Ubuntu software package manager. These  
packages came with pre-compiled 32-bit executables and with the source  
code. Personally, I think, the 32-bit compatibility libraries should  
be installed per default on any 64-bit linux for compatibility reasons.

Best regards,

Dirk Kostrewa.

Am 25.04.2008 um 23:54 schrieb trollord:

> Could you provide information which software packages you had problems
> with? Usually when you install a 32-bit application from  
> repositories it
> pulls in the 32-bit compatibility libraries as well. For some reason
> some application most likely did not.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>       Status: New => Incomplete
>
> -- 
> 64-bit version produces "No such file or directory" error with 32- 
> bit executables
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140621
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.


*******************************************************
Dirk Kostrewa
Gene Center, A 5.07
Ludwig-Maximilians-University
Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25
81377 Munich
Germany
Phone:  +49-89-2180-76845
Fax:    +49-89-2180-76999
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************

-- 
64-bit version produces "No such file or directory" error with 32-bit 
executables
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140621
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to