I am not pushing wqy's font as the default font at all. I am only trying to tell you what it is, and how it differers from the others fonts that people are using. Whether it is suitable to be included in ubuntu as the default font, it is a decision totally up to the Ubuntu management team, in this case, Arne and his colleagues at Ubuntu.
On the other hand, I personally do not like firefly's bitmaps, so do many friends that I know, that's why we modify it since 2004. This is just flavor differences, and we are happy that we have seen many supporters from CJK users in the past. Boning Chen wrote: > The point i was making is, there is no need to change font from any previous > releases of ubuntu. I was just using SimSun as an example, maybe a really > bad one, sorry. Anyways, I would just say stick with the Arphic UMing, as > Wenzhuo said. I mean we do want to make improvement to it. There is a reason > that the SimSun font is a successful font, because people simply like it. > The closest we can get to is the Arphic Uming, then let's use it. What we > should do is to improve the Arphic font, not to create a new font and put it > in a LTS release. I know the font is great work, and it's open sourced. But > i think we have time to perfect it, a LTS release should not contain > anything that is not tested enough, the same reason that Kubuntu with KDE4 > is not going to be LTS. > > > Boning Chen > -- ttf-wqy-zenhei and other Chinese fonts got mixed up where the same style is expected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
