Just some notes from a quick review of the installed binary packages... Other than a few minor polish items, this series of packages seems to be very fast and stable. Someone who actually uses Abiword should check them out, since they'll likely be able to do so in more depth than I can cover, _but_, I can say this: I would use Abiword for my next paper if I had to use a word processor at all.
One thing I did notice: “View→Presentation” says “TODO: This menu item doesn't have a StatusMessage defined”. Another thing that I noticed is that when entering Unicode characters directly (e.g., using the GNOME Ctrl+Shift+u entry method to input unicode characters) you cannot tell that the code point being typed is actually the code point and not normal text entry. I don't know how that is handled by the application (or not?) but when you do it in GNOME Terminal, for example, the code point is underlined as you type it. Otherwise, that functionality works just fine. Also, how does one get at the grammar checker so as to see /why/ there is green text under a passage? (Or is it intentionally not possible?) To sum it up, though, the only issues that I noticed at all were issues of tiny details which could use some polish. It looks like a great release, IMHO, and assuming that others think so, I think it should wind up in Hardy. -- Please update to version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
