On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 11:58 +0000, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> There's no need for more "We need 2.6 because I want it". I think
> everyone would like to see 2.6. The question is "How to get 2.6 in
> Hardy
> ?". It's a technical question.
>
> If you can provide help to package Abiword 2.6 or to resolve technical
> problems, you're welcome, otherwise please don't post any comment for
> now, it's useless and spam the subscribers for no reason.
Precisely. I attempted to package 2.6 and could not figure out the way
it has been previously packaged for Debian/Ubuntu. There are four
distinct upstream packages, and we only have one (combined) package with
a different layout than the upstream tarballs.
Would this be a good time to break the abiword-* packages out into
separate source packages, one per each upstream package?
--- Mike
--
Michael B. Trausch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home: 404-592-5746, 1 www.trausch.us
cell: 678-522-7934 im: [EMAIL PROTECTED], jabber
Ubuntu Unofficial Backports Project: http://backports.trausch.us/
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13149011/unnamed
--
Please update to version 2.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202174
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
