On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:07:54AM -0000, Lo??c Minier wrote: > Looking back at the changelog, I used -2~hardy1 while -2 was already in > Debian; what I meant to use was -3~hardy1, which might explain why this > was confusing. Another option would be -2+hardy1 which might be > clearer.
Right, yes. -3~hardy1 makes total sense -- -3 didn't exist yet. :) Thanks! -- glib2.0 version is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
