Murray Cumming wrote: >> we've been leaving it the responsibility of the submitter to send them > upstream. > > I don't think that's a good policy. It isn't happening. It's in your > interests to reduce the number of patches that you have to apply. > >> Matthias, can you make sure this happens? > This patch was submitted upstream first and was only submitted here because > of the delay in having it reviewed upstream. > Murray,
We have the same amount of flex as you do for influencing a patch to be added. With how many packages we maintain, this is a time saver if the submitter of such a patch can submit it upstream. It won't be until next time the package is touched sometime during the Intrepid schedule that we'd go through and see which ones upstream hasn't absorbed and try to add them upstream. -- Mario Limonciello [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Add resume support to irrecord https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197493 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
