Chris Brotherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Actually, you have it backwards.  Initially, ubuntu used the
> libgdamm-3.0-* naming scheme, but we changed it to match debians
> (libgdamm3.0-*).  So you should not have to change the binary package
> names in debian.
>

Has this already happened?  By searching on
http://packages.ubuntu.com/ I haven't found any package named
libgdamm3.0-*, so I guess it's not released yet.  Will it be possible
for Ubuntu to remain its naming convention?  I've already changed it
in Debian GNOME SVN to add '-'.  Please let me know what you plan to
do, and which Conflicts/Replaces field should be added for Ubuntu.

> Murray,
> You don't need to worry about the package names (other than the sonames).  
> Ubuntu just changed the binary package names to match debian.  So, in the 
> future, ubuntu can just sync from debian.
>
> -- 
> Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.

-- 
Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to