Chris Brotherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, you have it backwards. Initially, ubuntu used the > libgdamm-3.0-* naming scheme, but we changed it to match debians > (libgdamm3.0-*). So you should not have to change the binary package > names in debian. >
Has this already happened? By searching on http://packages.ubuntu.com/ I haven't found any package named libgdamm3.0-*, so I guess it's not released yet. Will it be possible for Ubuntu to remain its naming convention? I've already changed it in Debian GNOME SVN to add '-'. Please let me know what you plan to do, and which Conflicts/Replaces field should be added for Ubuntu. > Murray, > You don't need to worry about the package names (other than the sonames). > Ubuntu just changed the binary package names to match debian. So, in the > future, ubuntu can just sync from debian. > > -- > Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. -- Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
