I do not agree with setting the font to invalid. It could be invalid, if
by default I would be able to read any language. However, I am currently
not able to do so.

I am using Kubuntu 7.10. When I installed my system, I could not even
read Japanese text, only the characters that are in the Dejavu set
(kanas and a subset of the kanjis). So I HAD to set the language via the
language-selector to set it to ja_JP.

About accented characters: I am Hungarian, but I also want to be able to
read Japanese pages. Why is it so strange? So I DO care about accented
characters. As written in my first comment, I had to create an en_JP
(ok, it could have been called hu_JP) setting, which includes the
default deja/bitstream fonts for latin text.

Therefore your answer that "Japanese users don't use any latin characters 
besides ASCII" does not hold for three reasons:
1. There may be Japanese users, who want to use accented characters, because 
they are learning a European language
2. There are Western users who are learning Japanese, and who want to be able 
to read Japanese AND their mothertongue, too.
3. What about Chinese people learning Japanese, or Japanese people learning 
Chinese? Should they switch back and forth between ja_JP and zh_XX every few 
seconds?

With the current system settings, these users are in trouble. I do not
know about Hardy; if the selection algorithm is different there, it's
ok, but Gutsy is still supported, and will be for at least 1 more year,
right?

But even with my (en_JP) settings, when my friend sent me Chinese text
in Kopete, I could not read it. Only the characters that are common with
Japanese were shown; the others became squares. Now please read the
original report carefully: I understand why you have to choose between
Japanese and Chinese. I just don't agree with the current state, where
you have to choose between being able to read Japanese and not being
able to read Chinese, or vice versa.

I think the user should be able to choose which language he/she prefers;
but that should only make a difference in the order of the font list. So
for example, both Kochi Mincho and WenQuanYi ZenHei would be in the
list, but in the ja_JP file, Kochi would be higher in the list, and in
the zh_CN settings, WenQuanYi would be higher. Since there is no way to
get around the fact that there are characters that are different in
Chinese and Japanese, but have the same unicode value, this is the best
we can get.

Please have a look at the screenshot: Firefox is able to display the
Chinese text.  But it is pasted to Kopete, some of the characters (those
not in Kochi) become squares. If a Chinese font would be in the list, it
would be displayed in the same way as in Firefox (since Japanese fonts
have priority, the kanjis found in Kochi would be displayed by Kochi --
it is not perfect, but there is no better way).

Also, I believe when you "have hack your own fontconfig", it is a proof
that this bug is valid.

** Attachment added: "fonts.png"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12622239/fonts.png

-- 
Support all languages in fontconfig, language-selector is not enough
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201322
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to