Hi, On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Dean Sas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neal McBurnett wrote: > > I still think that marking the version information for in-development > > documentation would be very helpful.
No, I don't agree. As Dean has said, the site at doc.ubuntu.com is always up to date with the latest docteam branches - it's updated every 12 hours. It hardly ever happens that someone reports a bug which has already been fixed in the documentation, but when it does, it's extremely easy to find out. I really don't think there is a problem here worth solving. > > This is also true for the stuff at help.ubuntu.com. At least that says > > what release it is for, but not anything that would tell a user or > > documentation volunteer easily whether or not an update had been > > deployed, or where to find the source code for exactly what they are > > looking at. > > I think people would always assume it's always up to date. If it isn't, > it should be. I agree. At the moment we don't have a good process in place for deploying updates to documentation - so our documentation doesn't change after release and help.u.c is up to date. When planning how to deploy updates, ensuring help.ubuntu.com is up to date has always been central to that discussion. Either way, the website will be kept up to date and peoples' natural assumption will be correct :) -- Matthew East http://www.mdke.org gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF -- copyright dates not being updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192202 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
