* Colin Watson

> You might like to be aware that the Debian maintainer and the main
> Ubuntu maintainer for openssh are the same person, namely me. Having a
> go at Debian in Ubuntu bug reports often does not get the response you
> might be looking for ...

I was aware of that.  No offence intended.  I apologise if you felt that
way.

Red Hat, SuSE, and probably most other distros, are using the default
PAM config file location with no ill effects.  This modification is
undisputedly eccentric to Debian (and by extension Ubuntu).

I could not think of any sound technical reason for making such a change
in the first place, and at the same time it's fairly obvious that it was
not an accident either.  Whenever I stumble across «Debianisms» such as
this one they are usually due to some requirement in the Debian policy,
so I assumed that to be the case here too.

Since Ubuntu isn't bound to the Debian policy, I was hoping that the
Ubuntu packages could be changed back to the match the upstream default
and established practise of using /etc/pam.d/`basename $0` as the PAM
configuration file location.

Regards
-- 
Tore Anderson

-- 
sshd hardcodes SSHD_PAM_SERVICE
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to