> Google try to maintain upstream what they think the d/rules, d/control, etc. files should be [0] - so this was my attempt at unifying them. I could see they're not really applicable here but I feel it's still best to have parity.
Generally speaking, we do not expect upstream developers to have a good handle of Ubuntu packaging policy, so we don't expect the upstream debian/ directory to be in sync. > If you want to see that called out in the changelog do let me know and I'll add that. Yeah, every change to the package should be mentioned in the changelog - not necessarily in great detail, but every change should be acknowledged. eg: * debian/rules: also install new libfoobar.cfg thing or even * debian/install: refresh for new files in new version > That being said if you think having the .preset file is actually a detriment I can take it out and have it as a known diff. I'm not sure if it breaks Ubuntu policy by existing, but it might (I'm not familiar with exactly how systemd interprets those), and is not how sysadmins are expecting to interact with an Ubuntu system. This should be dropped, yes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2113792 Title: [SRU] Please update to 20250506.01 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-guest-agent/+bug/2113792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
