https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097605 was released, so I'm removing
the block-proposed tag.

** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble block-proposed-oracular

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  According to AMD's Speculative Return Stack Overflow whitepaper the
  hypervisor should synthesize the value of IBPB_BRTYPE and SBPB CPUID
  bits to the guest.
  
  Support for this is already present in noble kernel with commit
  e47d86083c66 ("KVM: x86: Add SBPB support") and commit 6f0f23ef76be
  ("KVM: x86: Add IBPB_BRTYPE support").
  
  Add support in QEMU to expose the bits to the guest OS.
  
  [Test Plan]
  
   * First of all we'll (and have in advance) run general regression tests
   * Qemu shall show to be aware of the new flags
-    #qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu ? | grep -E 'sbpb|ibpb-brtype'
+    #qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu \? | grep -E 'sbpb|ibpb-brtype'
       gfni hle ht hypervisor ia64 ibpb ibpb-brtype ibrs ibrs-all ibs intel-pt
       sbdr-ssdp-no sbpb sep serialize sgx sgx-aex-notify sgx-debug sgx-edeccssa
   * host:
    # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_rstack_overflow
    Mitigation: Safe RET
  
   * before (guest):
     $ cpuid -l 0x80000021 -1 -r
     0x80000021 0x00: eax=0x00000045 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
                              ^
     $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_rstack_overflow
     Vulnerable: Safe RET, no microcode
  
   * after (guest) with CPU flags added:
     $ cpuid -l 0x80000021 -1 -r
     0x80000021 0x00: eax=0x18000045 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 
edx=0x00000000
                              ^
     $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_rstack_overflow
     Mitigation: Safe RET
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
    * None to be expected as these flags are not (yet) included in any
  predefined CPU model
  
-   * Synthesizing the value of IBPB_BRTYPE and SBPB CPUID bits to the guest 
could have side-effects when migrating guests between fixed<->unfixed systems. 
Therefore, we executed the lengthy Server-team regression tests on two 
different testflinger machines that have the affected chipset, using a PPA 
build:
+   * Synthesizing the value of IBPB_BRTYPE and SBPB CPUID bits to the guest 
could have side-effects when migrating guests between fixed<->unfixed systems. 
Therefore, we executed the lengthy Server-team regression tests on two 
different testflinger machines that have the affected chipset, using a PPA 
build:
  - AMD ROME, fleep/Noble: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/VS374ffdN6/
  - AMD Milan, ziptoad/Oracular: https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/XhQnyPQxG9/
  
-   => Test results are looking good and only showed failures on
+   => Test results are looking good and only showed failures on
  focal->jammy cross-test migrations (which we didn't touch with this SRU)
  and some other, unsupported edge cases (e.g. noble->jammy & jammy->focal
  downgrade migrations). Therefore, we do not expect any side-effects from
  this SRU upload! See details in:
  https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/483036
  
  ---
  
  Relevant patches needed for qemu 8.2 in noble:
  
  target/i386: Expose IBPB-BRTYPE and SBPB CPUID bits to the guest:
  * 
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/0701abbf9880b5ab1cf44e0caa6ad173aec840e7.patch
  
  target/i386: Fix minor typo in NO_NESTED_DATA_BP feature bit:
  * 
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/9c882ad4dc96f658ff9f92b88b3749d0398e6fa2.patch
  
  target/i386: Expose bits related to SRSO vulnerability
  * 
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/2ec282b8eaaddf5c136f7566b5f61d80288a2065.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101944

Title:
  Expose bits related to SRSO vulnerability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/2101944/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to