I'm wondering if the DASD disks were always added/enabled in the same order? Means when the autoinstall file was created (maybe with the help of an interactive installation) and then later on when the early_commands to enable them were added to the autoinstall file. Especially because DASD ECKD devices of different sizes are involved (lsdasd shows Model 27 and Model 54). This reminds me a bit about LP#2097613.
And was the autoinstall done on LPAR or in z/VM? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2111695 Title: [Ubuntu24.04] - curtin - subiquity installation with multiple dasd sizes leads to an error in partitioning To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2111695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
