Public bug reported:

It seems to be a better idea to back out the ongoing tree-sitter
transition in the proposed pocket than to progress it further and risk
release pocket breakage.

Please remove the following packages only from plucky's proposed pocket;
they should stay as-is in the release pocket, please:

neovim
tree-sitter
tree-sitter-c
tree-sitter-lua
tree-sitter-query
tree-sitter-sdml
tree-sitter-vim
tree-sitter-vimdoc

I could certainly attempt to review the reverse-dependencies by hand,
but since any affected reverse depends will have stayed in the proposed
pocket. a no-change rebuild or a further removal might be necessary.
`reverse-depends` doesn't support the proposed pocket (and it's a known
bug), so while I can script it, on this one could we maybe let Britney
tell us if there's a straggler?

Thanks in advance.

** Affects: neovim (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-c (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-lua (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-query (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-sdml (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-vim (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged

** Affects: tree-sitter-vimdoc (Ubuntu)
     Importance: High
         Status: Triaged


** Tags: ftbfs update-excuse

** Also affects: neovim (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-c (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-lua (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-query (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-sdml (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-vim (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: tree-sitter-vimdoc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: neovim (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-vim (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-query (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-query (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-vim (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-c (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-lua (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-sdml (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: tree-sitter-vimdoc (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neovim (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-c (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-sdml (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-lua (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: tree-sitter-vimdoc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103681

Title:
  [p-m] Please remove tree-sitter from the proposed pocket

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neovim/+bug/2103681/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to