Hi Arif, > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/update_excuses.html#sosreport > > This is not a regression, but the hostname is set to autopkgtest. This will > be resolved in the next > upload
Could you please file an MP against ubuntu-hints to badtest this autopkgtest run for this version of sosreport? Then it will be green in the report, and we can release. An alternative is to trigger a migration-reference/0 run, which, if it fails as well, would also let this through, but that is "sticky" and would apply to all future updates (until a test run is green again), whereas the ubuntu hint will be for just this version. In the diff, please include a comment mentioning this bug here, the proposed fix, and/or the new bug that will be resolved in a new SRU. Just the basic bread crumbs :) 1. https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints- ubuntu/+ref/focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091858 Title: [sru] sos upstream 4.8.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2091858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
