Public bug reported:
[Impact]
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/extents.c:10: warning: "MAX"
redefined
10 | #define MAX(X, Y) ((X) <= (Y) ? (Y) : (X))
|
In file included from ./include/linux/kernel.h:28,
from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:21,
from ./arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:80,
from ./include/linux/irqflags.h:18,
from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:59,
from ./include/linux/wait.h:9,
from ./include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from ./include/linux/fs.h:6,
from ./include/linux/highmem.h:5,
from ./include/linux/bvec.h:10,
from ./include/linux/blk_types.h:10,
from ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:12,
from
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/extents.c:6:
./include/linux/minmax.h:330: note: this is the location of the previous
definition
330 | #define MAX(a,b) __cmp(max,a,b)
|
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c: In function
‘apfs_sb_set_blocksize’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:69:39: error: passing
argument 1 of ‘set_blocksize’ from incompatible pointer type
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
69 | if (set_blocksize(APFS_NXI(sb)->nx_bdev, size))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
| |
| struct block_device *
In file included from
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:7:
./include/linux/blkdev.h:1545:32: note: expected ‘struct file *’ but argument
is of type ‘struct block_device *’
1545 | int set_blocksize(struct file *file, int size);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c: In function
‘apfs_update_software_info’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:282:36: error: ‘struct
super_block’ has no member named ‘s_bdev_handle’; did you mean ‘s_bdev_file’?
282 | sbi->sbi_bdev_handle = sb->s_bdev_handle;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| s_bdev_file
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c: In function
‘apfs_unmap_main_super’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:328:17: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘bdev_release’; did you mean ‘seq_release’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
328 | bdev_release(sbi->sbi_bdev_handle);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
| seq_release
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/unicode.c:17: warning: "MIN"
redefined
17 | #define MIN(X, Y) ((X) <= (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
|
In file included from ./include/linux/kernel.h:28,
from
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/unicode.c:9:
./include/linux/minmax.h:329: note: this is the location of the previous
definition
329 | #define MIN(a,b) __cmp(min,a,b)
|
var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c: In function
‘init_inodecache’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:796:49: error:
‘SLAB_MEM_SPREAD’ undeclared (first use in this function)
796 |
SLAB_MEM_SPREAD|SLAB_ACCOUNT),
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:796:49: note: each
undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c: In function
‘apfs_attach_nxi’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:1534:26: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘bdev_open_by_path’; did you mean
‘bdev_file_open_by_path’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1534 | handle = bdev_open_by_path(dev_name, mode,
&apfs_fs_type, NULL);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| bdev_file_open_by_path
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:1534:24: warning:
assignment to ‘struct bdev_handle *’ from ‘int’ makes pointer from integer
without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
1534 | handle = bdev_open_by_path(dev_name, mode,
&apfs_fs_type, NULL);
| ^
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/super.c:1535:30: error:
invalid use of undefined type ‘struct bdev_handle’
1535 | bdev = handle->bdev;
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/transaction.c: In function
‘apfs_checkpoint_end’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/transaction.c:371:48: error:
‘struct block_device’ has no member named ‘bd_inode’
371 | struct inode *bdev_inode = nxi->nx_bdev->bd_inode;
| ^~
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/transaction.c: In function
‘apfs_end_buffer_write_sync’:
/var/lib/dkms/linux-apfs-rw/0.3.2-0ubuntu5/build/transaction.c:546:9: error:
implicit declaration of function ‘page_mkclean’; did you mean ‘pte_mkclean’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
546 | page_mkclean(page);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
| pte_mkclean
[Test case]
Install the latest linux-6.11 kernel on Noble:
$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:canonical-kernel-team/ppa
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt install linux-image-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-modules-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-modules-extra-6.11.0-12-generic \
linux-headers-6.11.0-12-generic
Install apfs-dkms:
$ sudo apt install apfs-dkms
[Fix]
Backport upstream patches to properly support the new linux 6.11 ABI.
[Regression potential]
We may experience regressions in systems that are using the Apple file
system module (apfs), especially with kernels >= 6.8 kernel.
** Affects: linux-apfs-rw (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2090930
Title:
apfs-dkms FTBS in Noble with the linux-6.11-hwe kernel
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-apfs-rw/+bug/2090930/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
