a) It looks like the patches are changing many more things than "just"
CS35L56 support. I'm not familiar with firmware-sof and these binary
files, but that's what it looks like (output truncated below for
brevity):
$ dquilt push -a
Applying patch 0001-Add-2.11-topology2-production-binaries.patch
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-adl-cs42l43-l0-cs35l56-l23.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-adl-rt711-4ch.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-adl-rt711-l0-rt1308-l12-rt715-l3.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-adl-rt711-l0-rt1316-l12-rt714-l3.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-adl-rt711-l0-rt1316-l13-rt714-l2.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-arl-cs42l43-l0-cs35l56-l2.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-arl-cs42l43-l0-cs35l56-l23.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-arl-cs42l43-l0.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-arl-cs42l43-l2-cs35l56-l3.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-arl-cs42l43-l2.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-hda-generic-2ch.tplg
patching file sof-ipc4-tplg-v2.11/sof-hda-generic-4ch.tplg
(...)
Applying patch 0002-Add-SOF-v2.11.1-signed-Intel-binaries-for-MTL-LNL-AR.patch
patching symbolic link
sof-ipc4-lib-v2.11.1/lnl/B36EE4DA-006F-47F9-A06D-FECBE2D8B6CE.bin
patching symbolic link
sof-ipc4-lib-v2.11.1/lnl/intel-signed/B36EE4DA-006F-47F9-A06D-FECBE2D8B6CE.bin
patching file sof-ipc4-lib-v2.11.1/lnl/intel-signed/drc.llext
patching file sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/arl-s/intel-signed/sof-arl-s.ri
patching symbolic link sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/arl-s/sof-arl-s.ri
patching file sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/lnl/intel-signed/sof-lnl.ri
patching symbolic link sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/lnl/sof-lnl.ri
patching file sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/mtl/intel-signed/sof-mtl.ri
patching symbolic link sof-ipc4-v2.11.1/mtl/sof-mtl.ri
Now at patch 0002-Add-SOF-v2.11.1-signed-Intel-binaries-for-MTL-LNL-
AR.patch
Could this be explained please? Why are all these other files necessary?
b) Given that not just CS35L56 files are being added/changed, but many others,
for apparently other hardware, that doesn't seem to match the regression
analysis:
> It only affects the Dell Bolan platforms with the new CS35L56 amplifier.
> Should be low low risk of
> regression
Is that statement still true? Only CS35L56 could be affected by a
regression?
** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077829
Title:
Missing CS35L56 sof firmware for Dell Bolan platform
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2077829/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
