@Didier - Thanks you for your comments .. Canonical will be using package from below branch for preload: Can you please review below: https://github.com/lenovo/lenovo-wwan-unlock/tree/ubuntu-oem
>> It doesn’t seem so? The version in the archive doesn’t fix any required >> TODOs I have seen, and latest version with the fixed libraries (v2.1.2) is >> not in either? I need binli support regarding your comment . >> - There are multiple other warnings in the lintian output. Some of them, like the -dbgsym package not shipping debug symbols could be fixed by bypassing -dbgsym generation. Others that are not in our control could be overridden to mute the warning. We can remove debug symbols by using below command for example: strip --strip-debug DPR_Fcc_unlock_service is this the expectation? If so, i can update binary and library in this branch . @binli - Can you please help to check debian package related comments in Comment#5. >> Do you mind uploading a new version (probably in Plucky), with those fixes >> (including Seth's requests) and then ping us for a rereview? That would be >> easier and let us approve it. Thanks! I havent tried using plucky but i can directly upload it in github and ask for review. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058192 Title: [MIR] lenovo-wwan-unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2058192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
