In regard to the AA new queue check this seems fine:
- same content as in Oracular (as expected, only diff is the backport in
changelog)
- Thereby the same ok for the License
- And the same ok for no namespace clash
I pondered for a bit between
7.2.5+dfsg1-2ubuntu3~24.04 (proposed)
And
7.2.5+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.1 (alternative)
7.2.5+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.24.04.1 (alternative)
...
But you are right, this very much follows [1] for identical backports from
devel release.
Thereby ack on version as well.
=> AA approval to this case
As discussed Andreas will later today have an SRU-look at this too, and
once both Acks are in we can act on it and document along the way what
exactly happens then via bug 2081202 - win/win :-)
[1]: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-maintainers-
handbook/blob/main/VersionStrings.md#version-backport-from-ubuntu-devel
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081000
Title:
Backport version from Oracular to Noble
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/valkey/+bug/2081000/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
