W: libjpegxl-java: bad-jar-name [usr/share/java/org.jpeg.jpegxl.jar] W: jpeg-xl source: newer-standards-version 4.7.0 (current is 4.6.2) I: jpeg-xl source: debian-rules-contains-unnecessary-get-orig-source-target [debian/rules] I: jpeg-xl-doc: file-references-package-build-path [usr/share/doc/jpeg-xl-doc/html/dir_e68e8157741866f444e17edd764ebbae.html] I: jpeg-xl source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/0008-Fix-conformance-test.patch] I: libjxl-tools: spelling-error-in-binary reencode re-encode [usr/bin/cjxl] I: libjxl-tools: typo-in-manual-page reencode re-encode [usr/share/man/man1/cjxl.1.gz:245]
- bad-jar-name is perhaps irrelevant to this MIR since we are explicitly wanting the -java package to stay in universe. I'll likely still followup with a Debian bug or maybe even a fix. - lijbxl-tools is also going to stay in universe - newer-standards-version is a false positive, waiting for a new version of lintian to recognize the latest version number of Debian Policy - debian/rules has a comment to explain why there is a get-orig-source rule - file-references-build-path may be a false positive. That filename has been used consistently since jpeg-xl 0.7 first landed in Debian/Ubuntu. ** Description changed: [Availability] The package jpeg-xl is already in Ubuntu universe. The package jpeg-xl build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl [Rationale] - The packages libjxl-gdk-pixbuf and libjxl0.9 (soon to have a soname bump to libjxl0.10) are required in Ubuntu main to enable JPEG XL files to be used as a desktop wallpaper and to be viewable in GNOME-ish apps like eog and shotwell - The package libjxl-gdk-pixbuf will generally be useful for a large part of our user base - The binary package libjxl-gdk-pixbuf needs to be in main to achieve JPEG XL support - It would be great and useful to community/processes to have the package jpeg-xl in Ubuntu main, but there is no definitive deadline. [Security] - Had multiple security issues in the past - https://ubuntu.com/security/cve?package=jpeg-xl - https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/jpeg-xl + Debian has marked the 2 2023 CVEs as "no-dsa (minor issue) + The remaining needs-triage bug in Ubuntu's tracker, CVE-2021-36691, has been marked by Debian as "negligible security impact" - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Packages do not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages do not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Packages do not expose any external endpoints - Packages do not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=jpeg-xl - Upstream's bug tracker https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/0.9.2-9 + - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/0.9.2-9ubuntu1 - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on all architectures except for s390x. - s390x is skipped (shows as "neutral") which is acceptable since the intended use of jpeg-xl is on desktops and s390x is not a desktop architecture. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/jpeg-xl - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field - Lintian overrides are present, but ok because this was affected by the t64 transition - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/libjxl/-/blob/master/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation or .desktop file) [Dependencies] - There are further dependencies that are not yet in main, MIR for them is at - highway https://launchpad.net/bugs/2070807 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be Ubuntu Desktop (~desktop-packages) and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built within the last 3 months in the archive - - Build link on launchpad: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/0.9.2-9 + - Build link on launchpad: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/0.9.2-9ubuntu1 [Background information] - The Package description explains the package well - Upstream Name is libjxl - Link to upstream project https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl - Some additional binary packages have no reverse dependencies and can remain in universe: + libjpegxl-java + libjxl-devtools + libjxl-tools - Before version 0.9, the gdk-pixbuf loader was not enabled in Debian or Ubuntu because it required skcms which is not available in Debian or Ubuntu; with version 0.9, the loader was buildable with lcms2 which is in Ubuntu main. It is not feasible to backport this to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which only has version 0.7. - - A gdk-pixbuf loader is required for an image format to be used as a - desktop wallpaper and to be viewable in GNOME-ish apps like eog and - shotwell + - A gdk-pixbuf loader for a image format is required for images with + that format to be used as a desktop wallpaper and to be viewable in + GNOME-ish apps like eog and shotwell - GNOME 46 (released in early 2024) switched its default desktop wallpaper to JPEG XL -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070882 Title: [MIR] jpeg-xl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2070882/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
