We don't implement OPTIMIZATION_NODE and TARGET_OPTION_NODE streaming:
case OPTIMIZATION_NODE:
case TARGET_OPTION_NODE:
// FIXME: Our representation for these two nodes is a cache of
// the resulting set of options. Not a record of the options
// that got changed by a particular attribute or pragma. Should
// we record that, or should we record the diff from the command
// line options? The latter seems the right behaviour, but is
// (a) harder, and I guess could introduce strangeness if the
// importer has set some incompatible set of optimization flags?
gcc_unreachable ();
break;
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945364
Title:
C++-20 module: internal compiler error
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1945364/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
