This is confusing. ndctl is producing libcxl binary packages now, but there is a libcxl package in the archive already, ppc64el-only.
libcxl | 1.7-2 | jammy/universe | source libcxl1 | 1.7-2 | jammy/universe | ppc64el ndctl | 71.1-1build1 | jammy | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x ndctl | 72.1-1 | jammy-proposed | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libcxl1 | 72.1-1 | jammy-proposed/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x Same in debian, except stable is obviously untouched (and using the original libcxl package) libcxl | 1.7-2 | stable | source libcxl1 | 1.7-2+b1 | stable | ppc64el ndctl | 72.1-1 | testing | source libcxl1 | 72.1-1+b1 | testing | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x ** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960064 Title: component mismatch: new dependency on libcxl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndctl/+bug/1960064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
