That's also going to involve more package work: * Does sosreport and sosreport4 needs to break/conflict ? or can co-exist ? I think it would make more sense to have one or the other.
* Make sure sosreport and sosreport4 follow the same upgrade path if one upgrade from focal to groovy. Note that groovy only has sosreport package which default to 4.0 To summarise the idea: Groovy (Currently in place as we speak): - binary package name: sosreport | upstream version: 4.0 Focal (arif-ali proposal): - binary package name: sosreport | upstream version: 3.0 - binary package name: sosreport4 | upstream version: 4.0 Bionic (arif-ali proposal): - binary package name: sosreport | upstream version: 3.0 - binary package name: sosreport4 | upstream version: 4.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892275 Title: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/sosreport/+bug/1892275/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
