The package in http://oem.archive.canonical.com/pool/public/libf/libfprint-2-tod1-goodix/ indeed looks better and has contents (ships .so, and hence the binary deps).
The one in the queue looks incomplete, and I guess should be rejected, as it is effectively empty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878359 Title: [needs-packaging] libfprint-2-tod1-goodix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1878359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
