> I guess this all means that 1) the version in focal-proposed is > correct, and 2) the xenial and bionic versions need the addition of > TimeoutStartSec=600 and Restart=on-failure to their service file, > right? Is that all that's needed?
I agree with your assessment regarding Focal and Groovy. However, I would like to verify this thesis for Bionic and Xenial to make sure that rabbitmq-server and systemd behave that way there as well. Note that the systemd service file on Bionic has an ExecStartPost calling a wrapper script in addtion to the ExecStart which wouldn't be necessary if the rabbitmq-server behaved the same way it does in Focal and Groovy. In addition I am uncertain why the service doesn't use `Type=notify` as in the later versions. Rabbitmq-server-3.6.10 understands what `sd_notify` is and I would have thought that this implies that we should be able to use `Type=notify` on Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874075 Title: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1874075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
