Another +1 on leave it alone would be that Bionic users could (if for whatever reason they don't want/can to modify the conffile) can also consider getting the cloud archive based new version from focal along that newer ovmf packages and then fully work as in focal.
For Eoan it is odd, essentially we now have: - Bionic -> Focal upgraders are fine - Bionic -> Eoan -> Focal upgraders have a change in Eoan and again one in Focal I'M glad that B-F should be smooth now. For B->E IMHO chances are high that those few affected in Eoan have fixed it somehow via local setup and the change would regresses exactly those people, while OTOH everyone else wouldn't mind either way as they are not using OVMF-secboot. I'm tempted to say both could be "won't Fix" as it seems like more pain than gain. What do you think Dann? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864532 Title: Incorrect nvram template for secboot firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/1864532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
