** Description changed: - While looking at a dmesg on an up-to-date eoan, I found certain lines - containing *BAD* and "can not find optimal value", "please specify...". - For me, they are just intimidating printfs. Should I get worried? + While looking at the attached dmesg on an up-to-date eoan, I found + certain lines containing *BAD* and "can not find optimal value", "please + specify...". For me, they are just intimidating printfs. Should I get + worried?
** Description changed: - While looking at the attached dmesg on an up-to-date eoan, I found - certain lines containing *BAD* and "can not find optimal value", "please - specify...". For me, they are just intimidating printfs. Should I get - worried? + While looking at the attached dmesg which comes from an up-to-date eoan, + I found certain lines containing *BAD* and "can not find optimal value", + "please specify...". For me, they are just intimidating printfs. + Should I get worried? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870994 Title: "*BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 32M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -18M" in dmesg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1870994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
