To reduce deviation from Debian, shouldn't we rather promote the emacs22
-non-dfsg source and binaries to main, add a dependency from our emacs22
package and drop the files from our emacs22? If I just remove the
package, then upgrades will still break (since it's not automatically
removed on upgrades), so you need a Conflicts:/Replaces: on emacs22
anyway. However, using the Debian packages seems much more sensible to
me.
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael W. Olson (mwolson)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Please remove emacs22-common-non-dfsg from the archive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172389
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
