On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 01:56:24PM -0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > This is the kind of things backports should be used for.
Backports are not used by default, and the backports archive is for when you want to give users the choice of the old vs the new behavior. My argument is that for a development tool, we should expect the trunk behavior consistently, and anything else is a bug; hence I believe it's suitable for SRU. Alternatively it could be distributed to Ubuntu developers as a snap (and therefore be release-agnostic). > Are there no chances for a new backports team to appear and maintain those > pockets? I think that is highly unlikely at this point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864571 Title: SRU ubuntu-dev-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1864571/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
