@juliank: The shim build is the same in both cases. The only difference is that one is signed by MS, the other self-signed. I did notice that key enrollment didn't work in my guest, which maybe a failure to execute mma64.efi, and therefore maybe related to bug 1864223.
My hypothesis is that the SB support for arm64 is not upstream, and there was a regression introduced when rebasing those patches on GRUB 2.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862279 Title: arm64 Secure Boot fails w/ "error: cannot load image." To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1862279/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
