On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:50 AM Robie Basak <1821...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > Surely if we're in agreement that we should be consistent, that means > that we either patch to make them one way, or we patch to make them > consistent the other way.
Umm this is derailing I think - the last time we talked as a bigger group IIRC the realization was there there exist different "types" of services which would eventually need different characteristics. Some are meant to be more "always up whatever happens" (like this case for auth) while others would want to stop providing any service like "before its wrong I better stop". The end of the discussion back then was that there - will be differences - and that it might end up that one needs to identify the different type of services that will exist and then group all packages into one of these groups. To then resolve any mismatch of "decision for group" vs "current behavior". Since none of the above exists yet, so far this decision is done on a per-package case like here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821927 Title: Systemd do not respawn sssd on failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1821927/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
