> The regression potential field for the bug is a bit 'poor', but
looking at the change itself I guess there's not much regression
potential anyway. It seems safe.
Maybe we can mitigate by thinking about how to test this. Could you
arrange testing with metadata of different sizes (<1Mb, 1Mb<x<10Mb,
>10Mb) for example, to make sure that edge cases behave as expected? If
that doesn't make sense that's fine, but please explain why.
To avoid holding this up I'll accept now, but please give some thought
to what could regression and add that to your SRU verification please.
** Changed in: fwupd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829813
Title:
fwupdmgr refresh shows "Mismatched XML" error in 16.04 Ubuntu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1829813/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
