Ok, so not having full context as some of the discussion was happening on IRC (and no mention of it was left on the bug here + the package was not rejected from the queue), I have possibly prematurely accepted the libnet-ssleay-perl SRU. After getting logs from Rik I see there's still no consensus on whether the read()/write() behavioral change is wanted/acceptable or not. When reviewing the package I got the impression that it was an approved change (per regression potential).
To my defense: with bionic-proposed being in a broken state causing build failures for both packages and images, the only two sane options were either accepting the package as-is or removing the two previous SRUs from -proposed. Since I was obviously missing context and did barge in uninvited: Steve, if you think that the SRU is not really acceptable as is, please request a follow up upload with further changes. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797386 Title: [SRU] OpenSSL 1.1.1 to 18.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwww-perl/+bug/1797386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
